I bought my Plane out of South Carolina (many years ago) but took a CFI with me
and got most of my required hours out of the way on the trip home.
2000 : I used a local CFI in Missouri for the legal checkout. He didn't know much. He would only allow me to go to 36 inches of manifold pressure. That's it. Said the rest was emergency power only. We were at a 400 foot field elevation. I did think - What a %$^ (airplane). It flew in the face of the POH. The "CFI" was adamant. So i got what i got on take-off performance - burning a lot of runway. The 2 hour checkout did fulfill the legal requirements but i was pretty unfamiliar with the airplane.
i called one of my friends (a CFII out of east coast) - he had checked me out in the T210 a couple of years before that. He flew to Missouri the next morning and we ferried the plane back - correctly using the POH and no issues. I dropped him off in Kentucky on the way and continued solo to my home base in Caldwell, NJ
So careful with "CFI".
I recently took off from KLMT on a high DA day. Elevation is 4100' and DA was around 6500'. The runway is 10,300 feet. I have a normally-aspirated 114, and I wasn't off the ground until almost 4500' down the runway, and wasn't comfortably climbing away from the runway until I was almost at the end. So, yeah, I definitely wouldn't want to try that in an airplane with less horsepower than I have in mine. There was never any question I could do it under the given loading/runway/environment conditions, but I'd *really* be questioning it in a 112. I would be inclined to echo this opinion and say if you want to go with a 112, make sure it's a turbo. Even in a 114, it's going to be a maximum performance take-off every time.
The TC has been fine ever since - max gross ; high DA, etc. I find the TAS (137-145) under 10K to be sufficient.
I have rarely operated it above 10K seeking the 150+ TAS ( during my Caribe flights mostly for more options) and to get over weather a few times - since i dont carry oxygen.
I would look at the turbo if high DA is a thing - as Kelsey highlights.
I have 5 hours in a C177 Cardinal - NA and i know what poor performance feels like (part of my journey to try different types)
These are the types i tried before i bought the 112TC :
PA28-161 - primary training
PA 18-181 - primary training
PA R201 - instrument training
PA28-R181 : Underperforming retract.
PAR201T - Cruising around SLC/Utah/Arizona
C177 RG - Poor DA performer
C172 RG - Poor DA performer
PA 28 -140 -- why did they even make this thing
PZL-150A - Nice 2 seater but not a travel machine. Comparable to a Cheetah.
DA - 20. : Composite kite. No way. I felt every mini-bump of airflow.
Cessna 172 variants : Part of instrument training / checkride and available to rent in most destinations
Cessna 152 : fun - but not for ownership.
Cessna T210 : Nice airplane - this was 1 consideration but my mechanic told me the OPEX is punitive here.
PA32-R301T Saratoga : Very nice aircraft. This is what i was pressing to buy. I had 20-30 hours in this.
112TC - Rockwell Turbocharged commander - this is what i found in my price range
I since added the BE76 and Seneca during my multi-ratings. I would want to own neither.
The Turbo experience with the T210 and PA32-Turbo toga convinced me that i wanted to end up with a turbo.
Renting the Turbo Arrow in SLC to fly to Utah and Page doubled down on that experience.
With 300 measly hours - i ended up with the TC - and have since added more than 1000 hours just in the TC ..